Gicker wrote: As far as allowing the ability to sort listings based on whether they're active/up or not, that's doable. However, whether they're actively developed or not, I'm not sure how to track that beyond listing owners ensuring their listing is kept up to date in that regard. I do have a MUD status field, but it might make more sense, to have two spearate fields: one for mud status (defunct, early development, testing phase, fully operational) and development status (no longer developed, occasional development, regular development, active development).
Did you have something else in mind in that regard?
Molly wrote: A question: Is this site mainly for new Muds under development?
If not, maybe the criteria of only moving muds where the entry in TMC has been changed in the last 30 months may not be a good one.
My Mud, 4 Dimensions, is not in the list here, and to be sure, the input in our listing on TMC hasn't been touched in ages. That doesn't however mean that the mud is not active and being continuously developed. There just hasn't been any reason for us to change any info in the TMC listing.
I suspect the the same can be said for a lot of the older and well established Muds on TMC, so the problem may be general.